Post before January 6
An old saying, "ignorance is bliss," implies that what you don't know can't hurt you. But let's examine this more closely. Isn't it better to know the truth about things?
Johnny Bear exposes a painful truth about the Hawkins sisters, one that Alex Hartnett believes would have been better left unsaid. But is the town any better for this?
Johnny Bear, by virtue of his savant ability to "record" conversations, can be compared to our media today, specifically the paparazzi and media stalkers who will do anything for a story to sell to TV, a website, or some magazine. But do we really need to know every sordid detail of every misstep and mistake that the rich, famous, and powerful take? Wouldn't it be better if our leaders---like our politicians, church leaders, and community leaders---were exempt from scrutiny and examination from the press? Or shouldn't we know so that these leaders can be held to higher standards of behavior, or at least standards that their position requires? These questions are more complex than you think, and they explain why the narrator of "Johnny Bear" isn't so sure if he's done the right thing as soon as he plunks down a quarter to get Johnny Bear started.
Answer one of these prompts (minimum of 250 words):
1. Research and write about how the media/paparazzi destroyed the career of someone famous who did not deserve it
2. Research and write about how the media/paparazzi uncovered important information about one of our leaders that was responsible for his or her downfall. Tell us whether you agree or disagree with what happened and the media's methods.
3. Research and write about some recently uncovered scandals that are almost too "creepy" to write about, and really serve no purpose for the common good.
4. Write about a TV show or web site that is in the "infotainment" business that goes "over the top" at times.
5. Research and write about how the media uncovered a "scandal" that bettered our society.