Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Sophs--For "Help" With Friday's Class Assignment (see Soph Journal #2 for the writing prompt)


First listen to the video (linked here) with the sound muted. As each character appears, try to identify the teenage movie stock character. This won't be too difficult, despite the somewhat laughable fashions of the 80s. The sad truth is that everyday we will also stereotype so quickly, often just based on the way someone dresses, walks, or talks.

The Breakfast Club,
a 1985 John Hughes written and directed film, first builds up its characters' stereotypes, only to shatter them to pieces. We, and the characters within the movie, see how all of these contrasting "types" are really more similar than they are different. Who would've thunk it (this expression is a cliche, the bad grammar completely necessary)? And it only took two hours of being locked into a room for a Saturday morning detention. Could life be so easy?

My capsule review of the movie? The critic in me, no longer a teen or even a young hip teacher, says that much of the movie dialogue today sounds so unreal, so exaggerated, so silly. And yes, the repeated use of the F word bothers me (I'll never get used to hearing teenagers curse). However, I have to admit that it (the dialogue) and the rest of the movie are never boring. Even in the preachy long monologues (and there are many), Hughes' characters make us care about them.

The lesson is this. Stock characters are OK in literature and film, but stereotyping in real life is dead wrong, and probably responsible for creating every hateful -ism known to mankind. Watch the film to learn that a man (or woman) shouldn't be judged by his clothes or the company that he keeps.

1 Comments:

At 7:41 PM, Anonymous AllisonB Green said...

My favorite stock character of all times is Jacques Clouseau from the Pink Panther. He is stereotyped as the clueless, dimwit that nobody wants to be stuck with. His mishaps however, create a humorous take on things. In the movie, the World Cup soccer team’s coach is murdered. Before he died however, he gave his pop star girlfriend Xania a diamond ring. Although after he is killed the ring is reported missing. The public and press are frantic for an immediate response as to who the killer may be. The Chief Inspector, Dreyfus, tells the public he will put his best man on the case. Instead, he assigns Jacques Clouseau. Dreyfus does not believe Clouseau will be able to break the case; he only wants the press to follow him around so he himself will be able to find the killer. Clouseau is the perfect stock character. With the stereotype he is given, he is set up to fail. After a series of events however, he proves himself as more than just a dimwit. He solves the murder before Dreyfus. He also discovers the stolen diamond. Clouseau shocked everyone. And so it goes Inspector Clouseau is not clueless after all.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home